MITRAS Medical Advisory

Medical R&D funding in Canada

Choose the right funding path before you start the paperwork.

MITRAS helps Canadian medical innovators assess SR&ED eligibility, evaluate research grant fit, and prioritize non-dilutive funding opportunities before spending time on paperwork.

Book a Consultation

Funding fit starts with the facts.

A useful funding search begins with what the team is building, what has already happened, the next measurable milestone, the organizations involved, and who will pay the costs. Those facts narrow the field far faster than a long list of programs.

MITRAS focuses on Canadian medical and life-science R&D. The work may involve a professional corporation, operating company, hospital, university, research institute, or partner. The funding route has to make sense across the whole arrangement.

Choose the right starting point

Choose the starting point that matches the work.

01

Medical SR&ED

For Canadian companies assessing systematic experimental work, eligible costs, evidence, and an open filing window.

Explore service →
02

Research grants

For applicants whose project purpose, activities, costs, location, timing, and partners align with a current program.

Explore service →
03

Medtech funding

For device, diagnostic, digital health, or medical software teams moving through development, validation, and commercialization.

Explore service →
04

Funding roadmap

For teams comparing viable credits and programs that may interact, conflict, or depend on one another.

Explore service →

What the work produces

A short list with reasons behind every recommendation.

Fit assessment

The strongest routes, the material eligibility questions, and the reasons each opportunity may or may not fit.

Timing view

Deadlines, prospective rules, project dependencies, and the order in which key decisions need to happen.

Next action

A practical recommendation: prepare, gather evidence, watch for an intake, or stop spending time on a weak route.

How MITRAS works

Move from a broad funding question to a practical next step.

  1. 01

    Understand the work

    Define the technical objective, project stage, milestones, organizations, budget, and prior funding.

  2. 02

    Screen the routes

    Compare possible credits and programs against the facts, current guidance, timing, and likely effort.

  3. 03

    Choose the priority

    Select the strongest next route and make the unresolved eligibility or evidence questions explicit.

  4. 04

    Prepare the selected route

    Where engaged, build the claim or application from the same technical and financial facts used in the assessment.

Official sources

Bring the project, the next milestone, and a rough budget.

A first conversation can connect the project stage and budget to the funding path worth examining.

Book a Consultation

Funding FAQs

The questions that usually decide the starting point.

The work may fit when a Canadian company undertook a systematic investigation to resolve a scientific or technological uncertainty and paid eligible costs within an open filing window. A research setting, difficult project, or unsuccessful result does not decide eligibility on its own.

SR&ED is a tax incentive that may apply to eligible experimental work already performed. Grants usually fund a defined future project and apply their own rules to the applicant, activities, costs, timing, partners, and expected results.

Sometimes. The same broader project can contain grant-funded work and SR&ED-eligible work, but the activities, claimant, agreements, assistance, and costs must be traced carefully. Government assistance can reduce the expenditures used in the SR&ED calculation.

Before the proposed work begins. Many programs have fixed intake periods, prospective eligibility rules, and restrictions on costs incurred before approval. Starting early also leaves time to confirm the applicant, partners, milestones, budget, and evidence.